Global ecological sustainability is imminently threatened by a massive ecological bubble. Global terrestrial, atmospheric, aquatic and marine ecosystems are no longer adequately intact to maintain conditions for life. The mark of progress and an equitable, sustainable economy is not how fast the economy grows at the expense of destroying these ecosystems. It is whether the basic needs and more of all Gaia's people and creatures are being met, while maintaining forever the ecological sustainability of their shared ecosystem habitats. [continue]
Recently in ecosystem collapse Category
From whatever perspective we choose this fact is clear “there is a threat to life as we know it”, and this threat is being constantly amplified by the actions of man. The actions of modern technological man have helped bring this threat very close to becoming real for us on this planet Earth. In a fundamental sense, life can exist only in low entropy “islands” within the isothermal energy system that is the universe. Descriptions of these phenomena can extend from gas clouds, to nebulae, to stellar and planetary systems. Information allows for more detailed descriptions of greater complexity, be it of physical or biological systems, all being organized and sustained by the differential flows of energy possible in such “islands”. [continue]
Stern warnings followed by stern warnings, as drought pushes up grain futures
[continue]
Faced with today’s economic crisis, many pundits are acting like fundamentalist preachers. Their rants accept certain centering truths as pure and eternal. They view the ‘free market’, for example, as a manifestation of nature, not a socially constructed model—not a crafted, even legislated, rationalization designed to yield general ‘economic’ predictability and control. Accordingly, they regard alternative interpretations and environmental accounting as unnatural market interferences. [continue]
As reality becomes harder to deny, I'm hearing an increasing number of cries,
growing in intensity and tinged with urgency welling up from the grassroots regarding
Peak Oil, catastrophic climate destabilization, biospheric toxicity, rapidly dwindling
quality of life, increasing wealth gap in the Global North, and increasing poverty in the
Global South: "What can we do?" However, all the proposed solutions from the
mainstream simply involve putting band-aids on the symptoms of industrialism and
empire. [continue]
We need to get prepared for four degrees of global warming, Bob Watson told the Guardian last week (August 11 2008). At first sight this looks like wise counsel from the climate science adviser to Defra. But the idea that we could adapt to a 4C rise is absurd and dangerous. Global warming on this scale would be a catastrophe that would mean, in the immortal words that Chief Seattle probably never spoke, "the end of living and the beginning of survival" for humankind. Or perhaps the beginning of our extinction. [continue]